Infidels Paradise

As the Republicans call for an investigation into ACORN, John Conyers, who was going to investigate ACORN until “the powers that be” back-walked him out of it oddly around the time his own wife was pleading guilty to corruption crap in their hometown, is asking again for an investigation into the ‘community organized’ crime entity … and into the two young journalists who broke the ACORN story for Big Government.

Hey, John, Monica been sentenced yet? What’s the hold-up?

Detroit Free Press:

Conyers seeks answers on ACORN

By TODD SPANGLER

WASHINGTON – House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers – a Detroit Democrat – is weighing into the controversy involving a much-maligned national community organization, asking congressional researchers whether any laws may have been broken by surreptitious recording of the group’s employees.

Just last week, the Democratic-led House followed up on a Senate vote that started cutting off federal funding for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, amid Republican-led calls for a widespread investigation into the group and its activities.

Even President Barack Obama has criticized the actions of ACORN employees in Baltimore, Washington, D.C., and elsewhere seen in sting videos. The employees appear to give tax advice to filmmakers pretending to be a hooker and her boyfriend.

Conyers and House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank of Massachusetts asked the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service on Tuesday to provide an analysis on several aspects of ACORN. Among them:

• Any current or previous criminal investigations into the group.

• A breakdown of any funding received by the group and any violations of the terms of that funding.

• A report on alleged improprieties in collecting voter-registration forms and “the extent … that resulted in people being improperly placed on voting roles and actually attempting to vote.”

• The group’s programs to provide housing opportunities.

It also asked for a report on private sting activities “in which individuals have reportedly visited ACORN offices, misrepresented their identities and proposed activities, surreptitiously videotaped resulting conversations with ACORN workers, and widely distributed them.”

The letter went onto say, “Conflicting allegations have been made about the propriety of these activities. Please research and report on the federal and state laws that could apply to such videotaping and distribution of conversations without the consent of all parties.”